Appeal No. 2003-1656 Application No. 09/725,973 In light of the foregoing, it is our ultimate determination that the reference evidence adduced by the Examiner establishes a prima facie case of obviousness which the Appellants have failed to successfully rebut with argument or evidence of nonobviousness. We hereby sustain, therefore, the Examiner’s § 103 rejection of all appealed claims as being unpatentable over Oozu in view of Jedlicka and Chiulli. See In re Oetiker, 977 F.2d 1443, 1445, 24 USPQ2d 1443, 1444 (Fed. Cir. 1992). The decision of the Examiner is affirmed. 77Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007