Ex Parte HINDI et al - Page 1




        The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not          
        written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.          
                                                              Paper No. 24          

                     UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                      
                                    __________                                      
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                         
                                 AND INTERFERENCES                                  
                                    __________                                      
                     Ex parte MAJID H. HINDI and ALLISON FLYNN                      
                                    __________                                      
                                Appeal No. 2003-1718                                
                             Application No. 09/344,295                             
                                    ___________                                     
                                      ON BRIEF                                      
                                    ___________                                     
         Before GARRIS, DELMENDO, and POTEATE, Administrative Patent                
         Judges.                                                                    
         DELMENDO, Administrative Patent Judge.                                     

                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                 
              This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134                 
         (2003) from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 1, 3                  
         through 8, and 10.  Claims 13 through 22, which are the only               
         other pending claims, stand withdrawn from further consideration           
         pursuant to 37 CFR § 1.142(b) (2003)(effective Dec. 22, 1959).             
              The subject matter on appeal relates to a recyclable,                 
         reinforced roofing membrane for use in single ply roofing                  
         systems.  According to the appellants (specification, page 1,              







Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007