Appeal No. 2003-1718
Application No. 09/344,295
But even if the references could be combined in the manner as
proposed by the examiner, the combination would not result in
the appellants’ claimed invention because neither Wynne nor
Paeglis provides any motivation, teaching, or suggestion to use
the recited propylene-ethylene copolymer sheets polymerized from
specific amounts of polypropylene and ethylene monomer.
For these reasons, we reverse the examiner’s rejection
under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) of appealed claims 1, 3 through 8, and
10.
7
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007