Appeal No. 2003-1726 Application No. 09/460,450 storing in a database a number of elements as a hierarchical structure, content identifiers being able to be associated with elements in the hierarchical structure, and one of the elements representing the device; referencing the hierarchical structure in the database to generate a profile for the device, the profile containing a number of content identifiers indicating content to be provided to the device; with reference to the content identifiers in the profile, causing the content indicated by the profile to be provided to the device; maintaining a record identifying the content provided to the device in accordance with the profile; upon receipt of a subsequent profile, comparing the content identifiers in the subsequent profile with the record to determine new content not yet provided on the device and old content no longer to be provided on the device, and using the relevant content identifiers to cause the new content to be provided to the device, and to cause the old content to be removed. The prior art reference of record relied upon by the examiner in rejecting the appealed claims is: Perlman et al. (Perlman) 5,742,820 Apr. 21, 1998 Claims 1 through 24 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as being anticipated by Perlman. Reference is made to the Examiner's Answer (Paper No. 16, mailed March 20, 2003) for the examiner's complete reasoning in support of the rejection, and to appellants' Brief (Paper No. 15, filed January 10, 2003) for appellants' arguments thereagainst. 2Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007