Ex Parte JACKSON et al - Page 2



          Appeal No. 2003-1726                                                        
          Application No. 09/460,450                                                  

               storing in a database a number of elements as a hierarchical           
          structure, content identifiers being able to be associated with             
          elements in the hierarchical structure, and one of the elements             
          representing the device;                                                    
               referencing the hierarchical structure in the database to              
          generate a profile for the device, the profile containing a                 
          number of content identifiers indicating content to be provided             
          to the device;                                                              
               with reference to the content identifiers in the profile,              
          causing the content indicated by the profile to be provided to              
          the device;                                                                 
               maintaining a record identifying the content provided to the           
          device in accordance with the profile;                                      
               upon receipt of a subsequent profile, comparing the content            
          identifiers in the subsequent profile with the record to                    
          determine new content not yet provided on the device and old                
          content no longer to be provided on the device, and using the               
          relevant content identifiers to cause the new content to be                 
          provided to the device, and to cause the old content to be                  
          removed.                                                                    
               The prior art reference of record relied upon by the                   
          examiner in rejecting the appealed claims is:                               
          Perlman et al. (Perlman)      5,742,820           Apr. 21, 1998             
               Claims 1 through 24 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e)            
          as being anticipated by Perlman.                                            
               Reference is made to the Examiner's Answer (Paper No. 16,              
          mailed March 20, 2003) for the examiner's complete reasoning in             
          support of the rejection, and to appellants' Brief (Paper No. 15,           
          filed January 10, 2003) for appellants' arguments thereagainst.             

                                          2                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007