The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was
not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 18
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte WARNER NITSCHKE, OTTO KARL, JOACHIM BAUER,
MICHAEL BISCHOFF, GUNTER FENDT, JOHANNES RINKENS,
STEFAN SCHAFFER and RICHARD BAUR
__________
Appeal No. 2003-1747
Application 09/647,296
___________
ON BRIEF
___________
Before COHEN, FRANKFORT, and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.
FRANKFORT, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 8 through 17, all of the claims remaining in
this application. On page 6 of the answer, the examiner
indicates that claims 13 through 15 and 17 are now “objected to
as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007