Ex Parte Nitschke et al - Page 2



          Appeal No. 2003-1747                                                        
          Application 09/647,296                                                      

          allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the             
          limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims.”                  
          Accordingly, the appeal as to claims 13 through 15 and 17 is                
          dismissed, and only the examiner’s rejections of claims 8 through           
          12 and 16 remain for our consideration on appeal.                           

          Appellants’ invention relates to a device for controlling                   
          restraint devices in a motor vehicle and seeks to guarantee                 
          reliable real-time operation of the restraint devices and to                
          provide each occupant of the vehicle individually with the                  
          greatest possible protection in a wide variety of accident                  
          situations.  The essential aspects and objectives of appellants’            
          invention are set forth on pages 2 through 6 of the                         
          specification, wherein an exemplary one of the plurality of data            
          processing units and its manner of operation are described.                 
          Independent claim 8 is representative of the subject matter on              
          appeal and a copy of that claim can be found in the Appendix to             
          appellants’ brief.                                                          





                                          2                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007