Appeal No. 2003-1747 Application 09/647,296 allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims.” Accordingly, the appeal as to claims 13 through 15 and 17 is dismissed, and only the examiner’s rejections of claims 8 through 12 and 16 remain for our consideration on appeal. Appellants’ invention relates to a device for controlling restraint devices in a motor vehicle and seeks to guarantee reliable real-time operation of the restraint devices and to provide each occupant of the vehicle individually with the greatest possible protection in a wide variety of accident situations. The essential aspects and objectives of appellants’ invention are set forth on pages 2 through 6 of the specification, wherein an exemplary one of the plurality of data processing units and its manner of operation are described. Independent claim 8 is representative of the subject matter on appeal and a copy of that claim can be found in the Appendix to appellants’ brief. 2Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007