The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and
is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 20
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte SRINIVAS ADAVIKOLANU
and
KAR HOONG POON
____________
Appeal No. 2003-1970
Application No. 09/586,526
____________
Heard: January 21, 2004
____________
Before WARREN, TIMM, and DELMENDO, Administrative Patent Judges.
TIMM, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This appeal involves claims 15-26, 32, and 33 as amended after the final rejection.1
Claims 15-26, 32, and 33 are all the claims pending in the application. We have jurisdiction over
the appeal pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134.
1Amendment filed November 5, 2002 entered as per Advisory Action mailed December 13, 2002.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007