Appeal No. 2003-1992
Application No. 09/075,777
Claims 6, 11, 16, 26, 31 and 36 stand rejected under
35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Bradbury in view of
Takach and further in view Bullock.
Claims 7, 10, 27 and 37 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103
as being unpatentable over Bradbury in view of Takach and further
in view of Parulski.
Claims 8, 9, 28 and 29 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103
as being unpatentable over Bradbury in view of Takach and further
in view of Hashimoto.
Claims 12-14 and 32-34 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103
as being unpatentable over Bradbury in view of Takach and further
in view Bullock and Iijima.
Claims 15 and 35 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
being unpatentable over Bradbury in view Takach and further in
view of Bullock, Iijima and Parulski.
Claims 17 and 37 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
being unpatentable over Bradbury in view of Takach and further in
view of Bullock and Sergeant.
Claims 18 and 38 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
being unpatentable over Bradbury in view of Takach and further in
view of Bullock and Ohta.
44
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007