Appeal No. 2003-1992
Application No. 09/075,777
material fact." Dembiczak, 175 F.3d at 1000, 50 USPQ2d at 1617,
citing McElmurry v. Arkansas Power & Light Co., 995 F.2d 1576,
1578, 27 USPQ2d 1129, 1131 (Fed. Cir. 1993).
The Federal Circuit reviews the Board's ultimate conclusion
of obviousness without deference, and the Board's underlying
factual determinations for substantial evidence. In re Huston,
308 F.3d 1267, 1276, 64 USPQ2d 1801, 1806 (Fed. Cir. 2002) citing
In re Gartside, 203 F.3d 1305, 1316, 53 USPQ2d 1769, 1776 (Fed.
Cir. 2000). "The Board's findings must extend to all material
facts and must be documented on the record, lest the 'haze of so-
called expertise' acquire insulation from accountability." In re
Lee, 277 F.3d 1338, 1345, 61 USPQ2d 1430, 1435 (Fed. Cir. 2002).
Upon our review of Bradbury, we fail to find that Bradbury
provides a teaching or a suggestion of attaching the peripheral
digital camera to the Bradbury's carrying case. Bradbury does
teach by way of example, the peripheral devices to be carried
within the body 4 of case 1 include a digital camera 30. See
Bradbury, column 3, lines 34-36. Bradbury further teaches that a
pair of retaining straps 35 and 36 extend from the bottom of body
4 to surround and retain the digital camera 30. The straps 35
and 36 may contain hook and loop material by which said straps
99
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007