The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 30 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte TIMOTHY P O'HAGAN ____________ Appeal No. 2003-2018 Application No. 09/057,261 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before THOMAS, FLEMING, and BARRY, Administrative Patent Judges. FLEMING, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of claims 1, 2, 4, 5, 8-18, 20 and 22, all the claims pending in the instant application. Claims 3, 6, 7, 19 and 21 have been canceled. Invention The invention relates to a speech recognition system. See page 1 of Appellant's specification. Many conventional speech decoding systems utilize a phonetic encoder to convert the digital signals representing the utterance into a sequence of phoneme codes. Each phoneme is the smallest unit of speech thatPage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007