Ex Parte O'HAGAN - Page 1




               The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not     
               written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.     
                                                               Paper No. 30           
                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                    ____________                                      
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                    ____________                                      
                             Ex parte TIMOTHY P O'HAGAN                               
                                    ____________                                      
                                Appeal No. 2003-2018                                  
                             Application No. 09/057,261                               
                                    ____________                                      
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                    ____________                                      
          Before THOMAS, FLEMING, and BARRY, Administrative Patent Judges.            
          FLEMING, Administrative Patent Judge.                                       


                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of               
          claims 1, 2, 4, 5, 8-18, 20 and 22, all the claims pending in the           
          instant application.  Claims 3, 6, 7, 19 and 21 have been                   
          canceled.                                                                   
                                      Invention                                       
               The invention relates to a speech recognition system.  See             
          page 1 of Appellant's specification.  Many conventional speech              
          decoding systems utilize a phonetic encoder to convert the                  
          digital signals representing the utterance into a sequence of               
          phoneme codes.  Each phoneme is the smallest unit of speech that            






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007