Appeal No. 2003-2018
Application No. 09/057,261
content specific to the GUI display file. We agree that Barclay
teaches in column 3, lines 9-23, that prior art systems have
downloaded grammar from a Web page. However, Barclay teaches in
column 3, lines 7-8, that speech recognizer software is not to be
downloaded. Thus, we find nothing in the Barclay teachings that
suggests communicating phonemes from a host computer to a mobile
terminal. In addition, we find that Barclay discusses the
problem with downloading vocabulary and grammar associated system
at runtime due to the large file sizes. Therefore, we fail to
find anything within these teachings that would have suggested to
one skilled in the art to modify the Barclay system so as to
communicate a graphical user interface (GUI) display file to a
mobile terminal, the GUI display file having attached thereto at
least one of a dictionary file having phonemes and syntax file
having allowable patterns of words to facilitate speech
recognition as recited in Appellant's claims.
88
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007