The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 23 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte SATORU ICHIHASHI, MASAYOSHI KAI, RYUICHI OKAMURA, KUNIKAZU NEGISHI and TAKESHI MASAKI ____________ Appeal No. 2003-2034 Application No. 09/667,727 ____________ HEARD: JANUARY 6, 2004 ____________ Before COHEN, FRANKFORT, and PATE, Administrative Patent Judges. COHEN, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is an appeal from the final rejection of claim 3, the sole claim remaining in the application. Appellants' invention pertains to an apparatus for simulating a ride on a vehicle in a form of a motorcycle. A basic understanding of the invention can be derived from a reading of claim 3, a copy of which appears in the APPENDIX to the main brief (Paper No. 11).Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007