Appeal No. 2003-2076 Page 9
Application No. 09/428,364
Based on our analysis and review of Scholder and claims 1, 9 and 17, it is our
opinion that the differences are: (1) a plurality of installation code elements also
marking the respective external connector adapted to connect with the respective
system connector as recited in claims 1 and 9; (2) installation documentation having a
plurality of information sections, each information section containing information
pertaining to making the desired connection between one of the system connectors and
the respective external connector, each information section also being marked with a
section identifying heading that includes the installation code element which marks the
respective system connector and respective external connector to which the information
section pertains as recited in claims 1 and 9; (3) marking each respective external
connector with the respective installation code element which marks the respective
system connector with which the respective external connector is adapted to connect as
recited in claim 17; and (4) labeling each information section of the documentation
containing information pertaining to making the connection between a particular system
connector and the respective external connector with a section identifying heading that
includes the respective installation code element which marks the respective system
connector and respective external connector to which the information section pertains
as recited in claim 17.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007