Appeal No. 2003-2076 Page 10
Application No. 09/428,364
With regard to these differences, the examiner determined (final rejection, pp. 3-
5) that it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art to (1) include
with the system of Scholder documentation with installation code element labels that
also appear on the connectors as suggested by Crane, and (2) include the section
identifying headings of Commodore with the computer system of Scholder as modified
by Crane.
The appellants argue that the applied prior art does not suggest each information
section in the installation documentation being marked with a section identifying
heading that includes the installation code element which marks the respective system
connector and respective external connector to which the information section pertains.
We agree. In that regard, it is our opinion that the applied prior art does not suggest
having the plurality of installation code elements which mark the plurality of system
connectors also mark the respective external connector adapted to connect with the
respective system connector let alone that each information section of the installation
documentation containing information pertaining to making the desired connection
between one of the system connectors and the respective external connector also
being marked with the installation code element which marks the respective system
connector and respective external connector to which the information section pertains.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007