Ex Parte OOISHI - Page 2




              Appeal No. 2003-2105                                                                 Page 2                
              Application No. 08/755,928                                                                                 


              receives VCI (as a feedback signal) and a reference potential (Vref).  Based on its                        
              comparison of the two signals, the comparator provides a control signal (S1) to the gate                   
              of Q1.  (Spec. at 1.)                                                                                      


                     When VCI is lower than Vref, S1 causes Q1 to conduct heavily, which increases                       
              the current supplied from VCE.  Consequently, the circuit raises the lower VCI.                            
              Conversely, when VCI is higher than Vref, S1 causes Q1 to conduct lightly, which stops                     
              the current supply from VCE.  Consequently, the circuit prevents the higher VCI from                       
              increasing.  In this manner, the circuit supplies the internal power-source potential equal                
              to the reference potential.  (Id. at 1-2.)  The appellant opines that variations in the                    
              external power-source potential, however, may cause decreased performance of the                           
              circuit, resulting in "difficulties in supplying the internal power-source potential with high             
              accuracy."  (Id. at 3.)                                                                                    


                     In contrast, Figure 43 of the specification shows the appellant's supply circuit.                   
              More specifically, two connectors (L1 and L2) supply an external power-source                              
              potential (VCE) to a transistor (Q1) and a comparator (1), respectively.  The appellant                    
              asserts that, "[s]uch an arrangement prevents the comparator 1 from being affected by                      
              the . . . transistor Q1."  (Id. at 66.)                                                                    









Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007