Ex Parte CHO - Page 2



          Appeal No. 2003-2108                                                        
          Application No. 08/881,123                                                  

               Claim 1 is illustrative of the claimed invention, and it               
          reads as follows:                                                           
                    1.  An apparatus having a memory controller for                   
               controlling access to a memory by a plurality of devices,              
               the apparatus comprising:                                              
                    a priority order controller                                       
                         to generate either                                           
                                   an acknowledgment signal to a                      
               corresponding one of the plurality of devices in response to           
               a request signal generated by the corresponding device, or             
                                   the acknowledgment signal to the                   
               corresponding device according to a predetermined priority             
               order if more than one request signal is simultaneously                
               generated from the plurality of devices, and                           
                         to subsequently deactivate the generated                     
               acknowledgment signal if an access actuation signal is                 
               deactivated,                                                           
                    wherein the access actuation signal is distinct from              
               the request signal and is issued by the memory controller to           
               indicate that one of the plurality of devices is accessing             
               the memory.                                                            
               The reference relied on by the examiner is:                            
          Craft et al. (Craft)          5,438,666           Aug. 1, 1995              
               Claims 1, 2 and 5 through 20 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.            
          § 102(b) as being anticipated by Craft.                                     
               Reference is made to the briefs (paper numbers 31 and 34)              
          and the answer (paper number 32) for the respective positions of            
          the appellant and the examiner.                                             
                                          2                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007