Ex Parte CHO - Page 6



          Appeal No. 2003-2108                                                        
          Application No. 08/881,123                                                  

               The anticipation rejection of claims 7 through 12, 18 and              
          19 is reversed because Craft does not deactivate “the                       
          acknowledgment signal upon the deactivation of the access                   
          actuation signal” (brief, page 9).  As indicated supra, the two             
          signals are a single signal in Craft, and are deactivated in                
          unison.                                                                     
               The anticipation rejection of claim 13 is reversed because             
          Craft does not “subsequently deactivate the generated                       
          acknowledgment signal if the access actuation signal is                     
          deactivated.”                                                               
               The anticipation rejection of claims 14 and 20 is reversed             
          because Craft does not “generate and transmit the access request            
          signal to said memory controller in response to the generation of           
          the corresponding acknowledgment signal.”                                   










                                          6                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007