Ex Parte Gotou et al - Page 1




               The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
                                                                                              Paper No. 29              
                          UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                     
                                                     ____________                                                       
                                BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                      
                                              AND INTERFERENCES                                                         
                                                     ____________                                                       
                                  Ex parte TSUNETOSHI GOTOU and NOBUO ABE                                               
                                                     ____________                                                       
                                                 Appeal No. 2003-2136                                                   
                                               Application No. 09/562,952                                               
                                                     ____________                                                       
                                                HEARD: March 17, 2004                                                   
                                                     ____________                                                       
              Before HAIRSTON, MARTIN, and BARRY, Administrative Patent Judges.                                         
              BARRY, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                       


                                                DECISION ON APPEAL                                                      
                     A patent examiner rejected claims 7-17.  The appellants appeal therefrom under                     
              35 U.S.C. § 134(a).  We affirm-in-part.                                                                   


                                                   BACKGROUND                                                           
                     The invention at issue on appeal is a method for manufacturing a spark plug for                    
              an internal combustion engine; the spark plug includes a noble metal chip bonded on                       
              the tip of a center electrode.  (Spec. at 1.)  Laser welding is used to bond the noble                    
              metal chip to the center electrode.  More specifically, a laser beam having a high energy                 
              density is focused on a junction of the chip and the electrode.  The noble metal of the                   






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007