Ex Parte Gilpatrick et al - Page 2


          Appeal No. 2003-2168                                                        
          Application No. 09/996,010                                                  

          the only other pending claims, stand withdrawn from further                 
          consideration pursuant to 37 CFR § 1.142(b) (2003)(effective                
          Dec. 22, 1959).                                                             
               The subject matter on appeal relates to a strong                       
          lightweight airbag cushion for deployment in opposing relation              
          to a vehicle occupant during a collision event.  Further details            
          of this appealed subject matter are recited in representative               
          claim 1 reproduced below:                                                   
                    1.  A strong lightweight airbag cushion for                       
               deployment in opposing relation to a vehicle occupant                  
               during a collision event, the cushion comprising: a                    
               body of wound yarn including an interior, a face                       
               portion for contact with the vehicle occupant and a                    
               rear portion including an inlet port for the                           
               introduction of an inflation medium into the body,                     
               wherein the body comprises windings of yarn such that                  
               the yarn is spread substantially evenly across said                    
               face portion of said body and such that the yarn is                    
               disposed preferentially across the back of said body                   
               in the area surrounding the inlet port so as to form a                 
               localized region of enhanced thickness around the                      
               inlet port.                                                            
               The examiner relies on the following prior art references              
          as evidence of unpatentability:                                             
          Onoe et al.             JP 4-2538           Jan. 07, 1992                  
               (Published JP application)                                             
          Yoshida et al.           JP 4-15142          Jan. 20, 1992                  
               (Published JP application)                                             

                                                                                     
          (paper 10) that the amendment will be entered for purposes of               
          this appeal.                                                                


                                          2                                           



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007