The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 15 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _____________ Ex parte SESHADRI VIKRAM and WILLIAM J. SCHAEFER _____________ Appeal No. 2004-0133 Application No. 09/668,031 ______________ ON BRIEF _______________ Before KIMLIN, GARRIS and STAAB, Administrative Patent Judges. KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1-3, 5, 7-9, 11 and 12, all of the claims remaining in the present application. Claim 1 is illustrative: 1. A packaged integrated circuit comprising: a die having first and second surfaces and a multiplicity of die contacts arranged on the first surface of the die; a barrier layer deposited on the second surface of the die;Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007