The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 25 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte TIMOTHY W. BICKMORE, WILLIAM N. SCHILIT, ANDREAS GIRGENSOHN, and JOSEPH W. SULLIVAN ____________ Appeal No. 2004-0171 Application No. 09/239,295 ____________ ON BRIEF1 ____________ Before JERRY SMITH, BARRY, and SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judges. BARRY, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL A patent examiner rejected claims 1-11, 17-20, 24, 25, 47-51, and 57-70. The appellants appeal therefrom under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a). We reverse. BACKGROUND The invention at issue on appeal displays documents from the world-wide web ("Web") on personal digital assistants ("PDAs") and cellular telephones ("cell- phones"). According to the appellants, most documents on the Web are designed for 1An oral hearing was waived. (Paper No. 24.)Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007