Ex Parte Clapper - Page 2



          Appeal No. 2004-0172                                                        
          Application No. 09/528,628                                                  

          sufficient to fill the time interval.                                       

               Representative independent claim 31 is reproduced as                   
          follows:                                                                    
               31.  A method comprising:                                              
               receiving an indication of a starting frame of a video                 
          sequence;                                                                   
               automatically displaying a thumbnail depiction of the                  
          selected starting frame of the sequence;                                    
               receiving an indication of the time interval of the                    
          sequence; and                                                               
               automatically displaying a thumbnail depiction of a series             
          of frames following said starting frame sufficient to fill said             
          time interval.                                                              
               The examiner relies on the following references:                       
          Shore et al. (Shore)          5,760,767         Jun. 2, 1998                
          Desai et al. (Desai)          6,034,746         Mar. 7, 2000                
               Claims 31, 35-37 and 41-43 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.              
          § 102(b) as anticipated by Shore.                                           
               Claims 32-34, 38-40 and 44 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.              
          § 103 as unpatentable over Shore and Desai.                                 
               Reference is made to the brief and answer for the respective           
          positions of appellant and the examiner.                                    

                                         -2–                                          




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007