The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for
publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 25
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte FERNANDO C. M. MARTINS and RAJEEB HAZRA,
_____________
Appeal No. 2004-0226
Application No. 09/216,184
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before KRASS, HAIRSTON and RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent Judges.
KRASS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of claims 1, 3-8, 14-17
and 19-29.
The invention is directed to a bit rate control system for a video encoder, best
illustrated by reference to representative independent claim 1, reproduced as follows:
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007