The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 23
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte STACY HAITSUKA, RONALD BURR,
HAROLD MACKENZIE, MARWAN ZEBIAN,
TERRY WARREN and SHANE BLASER
____________
Appeal No. 2004-0228
Application No. 09/348,411
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before KRASS, GROSS, and SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judges.
KRASS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of
claims 1-29.
The invention pertains to ad displays on the internet. In
particular, a client application enables access to an online
service and causes the display of advertisements while the user
uses the client application to access the online service. The
client application establishes a communication channel from a
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007