Appeal No. 2004-0242 Page 2 Application No. 09/873,594 BACKGROUND The appellant's invention relates to golf balls and, more particularly, to improved standard and oversized golf balls comprising multi-layer covers which have a comparatively hard inner layer and a relatively soft outer layer such as that produced by the use of a polyurethane based outer layer. The improved multi-layer golf balls provide for enhanced distance and durability properties over single layer cover golf balls while at the same time offering enhanced "feel" and spin characteristics generally associated with soft balata and balata-like covers of the prior art (specification, p. 1). A copy of the claims under appeal is set forth in the appendix to the appellant's brief. The prior art references of record relied upon by the examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are: Nesbitt 4,431,193 Feb. 14, 1984 Wu 5,334,673 Aug. 2, 1994 Claims 1, 4 to 7, 10 to 13 and 16 to 18 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Nesbitt in view of Wu. Rather than reiterate the conflicting viewpoints advanced by the examiner and the appellant regarding the above-noted rejections, we make reference to the answerPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007