The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 37
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte TINYU LI and YAN WANG
__________
Appeal No. 2004-0275
Application No. 09/318,186
__________
ON BRIEF1
__________
Before WINTERS, WILLIAM F. SMITH, and MILLS, Administrative Patent
Judges.
MILLS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
examiner’s final rejection of claims 60-65, 67-69, 71, 74, 77, and 802, which are
all the pending claims in the application.
1 Appellants waived their request for oral hearing, therefore we consider this
appeal on Brief.
2 The examiner’s Answer refers to a claims 72, 73, 78 and 79 in error, as these
claims were cancelled in Paper No. 31. The above stated claims are the only
claims at issue in this appeal.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007