The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and
is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 18
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte RUPERT P. DAY
____________
Appeal No. 2004-0383
Application No. 09/703,279
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before WILLIAM F. SMITH, TIMM, and ADAMS, Administrative Patent Judges.
TIMM, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Claims 1-3, 5-16, and 18-23 are pending in the application and all of the pending claims
are rejected by the Examiner as unpatentable. As Appellant states that claims 1-3, 5-10, 14-16,
and 18-23 are the subject of the appeal (Brief, p. 2), we will limit our review to those claims.1
Accordingly, the rejection of claims 13-15 will not be reviewed. We have jurisdiction over the
appeal pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134.
1References to the Brief are to the Supplemental Brief filed on June 2, 2003.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007