Ex Parte Day - Page 2




              Appeal No. 2004-0383                                                                   Page 2               
              Application No. 09/703,279                                                                                  


                                                   INTRODUCTION                                                           
                     The claims are directed to a powder composition and a process for treating skin by                   
              contacting the skin with the powder composition.  The powder composition, at a minimum,                     
              contains two basic components: a solid particulate component and chitosan in particulate form.              
              Claims 1 and 14 are illustrative on the invention on appeal:                                                
                     1.  A powder composition comprising a solid particulate component and from about 0.01                
              to about 10% by weight, based on the weight of the composition, of chitosan having a particle               
              size of from about 0.1 to about 50 microns.                                                                 
                     14.  A process for treating skin comprising contacting the skin with a powder                        
              composition containing a solid particulate component and from about 0.01 to about 10% by                    
              weight, based on the weight of the composition, of chitosan having a particle size of less than             
              400 microns.                                                                                                
                     As evidence of unpatentability, the Examiner relies upon the following prior art                     
              references:2                                                                                                
              Yoshihide Kawamura et al. (Yoshihide)      JP 63-027,501                       Feb. 5, 1988                 
              Toshiya et al. (Toshiya)                   JP 11-124,324                       May 11, 1999                 
                     Claims 1-3, 5-16, and 18-23 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being                         
              unpatentable over Yoshihide in view of Toshiya.  For the reasons expressed by Appellant in the              
              Brief and the following reasons we reverse with respect to the claims on appeal, claims 1-3, 5-             
              10, 14-16, and 18-23.                                                                                       




                     2We rely upon and cite to the English translations of record for each of the references.             







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007