The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 18
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte MEI-CHEN WANG
____________
Appeal No. 2004-0390
Application No. 09/727,397
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before ABRAMS, STAAB, and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.
NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection (Paper no. 7,
mailed March 19, 2002) of claims 1 to 3 and 5. Claims 8 to 11 have been allowed.
Claims 6 and 7 have been objected to as depending from a non-allowed claim. Claim 4
has been canceled.
We REVERSE.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007