The opinion in support of the decision being
entered today was not written for publication
and is not binding precedent of the Board.
_______________
Paper No. 36
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
Ex parte DANIEL E. TEDESCO,
JAMES A. JORASCH,
and JAY S. WALKER
Appeal No. 2004-0403
Application 09/100,6841
HEARD: May 6, 2004
Before BARRETT, RUGGIERO, and LEVY, Administrative Patent Judges.
BARRETT, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a) from
the final rejection of claims 1-13, 22-26, and 28-30.
We reverse but enter new grounds of rejection.
1 Application for patent filed June 19, 1998, entitled
"Billing Statement Customer Acquisition System," which is a
continuation-in-part of Application 08/982,149, filed
December 1, 1997, now U.S. Patent 6,196,458, issued
March 6, 2001.
- 1 -
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007