Appeal No. 2004-0441 Application 09/777,535 affix to; connect or join”.2 The appellants’ specification, which discloses, as affixing techniques, screen printing, pad printing, rolling and molding (page 7, lines 8-16), does not indicate that the appellants are using the term “affix” more broadly than its dictionary definition. The examiner argues that Foley’s elastomeric seal is affixed to the annular cover by the spring exerting a force on the annular cover which, in turn, exerts a force on the elastomeric seal, thereby preventing the elastomeric seal from moving from the annular cover (answer, pages 4-5). This argument is not well taken because the pressing action of Foley’s spring does not fasten, connect or join the annular cover (67) and the elastomeric flange (77) and, therefore, does not affix the elastomeric flange to the annular cover. Hence, even if Binford and Foley are combined as proposed by the examiner, the appellants’ claimed invention is not produced. See Uniroyal, Inc. v. Rudkin-Wiley Corp., 837 F.2d 1044, 1052, 5 USPQ2d 1434, 1439 (Fed. Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 825 (1988). 2 Webster’s New Riverside University Dictionary 136 (Riverside 1984). A copy of this dictionary definition is provided to the appellants with this decision. 5Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007