Appeal No. 2004-0441
Application 09/777,535
For the above reasons we conclude that the examiner has not
carried the burden of establishing a prima facie case of
obviousness of the appellants’ claimed invention.
DECISION
The rejections under 35 U.S.C. § 103 of claims 1, 3, 11
and 13 over Binford in view of Foley, and claims 2, 9, 10, 12, 19
and 20 over Binford in view of Foley and Kirchner, are reversed.
REVERSED
BRADLEY R. GARRIS )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
CHARLES F. WARREN )
Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND
)
) INTERFERENCES
)
TERRY J. OWENS )
Administrative Patent Judge )
TJO:pgc
7
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007