Ex Parte TETRICK - Page 1



               The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not     
               written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.     
                                                              Paper No. 35            

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                                                                     
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                                                                     
                             Ex parte RAYMOND S. TETRICK                              
                                    ____________                                      
                                Appeal No. 2004-0442                                  
                             Application No. 09/222,953                               
                                    ____________                                      
                                      ON BRIEF1                                       
                                                                                     
                                    ____________                                      
          Before HAIRSTON, GROSS, and BLANKENSHIP, Administrative Patent              
          Judges.                                                                     
          GROSS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                         

                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final                 
          rejection of claims 1 through 21, which are all of the claims               
          pending in this application.                                                





               1  We note that the hearing scheduled for May 18, 2004 was             
          waived by appellant.                                                        




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007