Ex Parte TETRICK - Page 2



          Appeal No. 2004-0442                                                        
          Application No. 09/222,953                                                  

               Appellant's invention relates to an averaging measurement              
          circuit using a subtracter, an adder, and a single register.                
          Claim 1 is illustrative of the claimed invention, and it reads as           
          follows:                                                                    
               1.   An averaging measurement circuit comprising:                      
               a register adapted to successively store a series of data              
          words having a plurality of bits, said register adapted to                  
          provide, for each of said data words, a first output signal                 
          comprising all of the plurality of bits of the data word and a              
          second output signal comprising a number of the higher order bits           
          of the data word;                                                           
               a subtracter adapted to subtract each second output signal             
          of said register from a corresponding data sample and output a              
          corresponding subtraction result; and                                       
               an adder to add each first output signal of the register to            
          a corresponding subtraction result and store the result in said             
          register.                                                                   
               The prior art references of record relied upon by the                  
          examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are:                              
          Ito                      4,829,460                May  09, 1989             
          Ono et al. (Ono)         5,448,508                Sep. 05, 1995             
               Claims 1, 4, 6, 9, 11, 17, and 20 stand rejected under                 
          35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by Ono.                             
               Claims 5, 10, 16, and 21 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.                
          § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Ono.                                    



                                          2                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007