Ex Parte LIPARI et al - Page 3


                  Appeal No.  2004-0482                                                           Page 3                   
                  Application No.  09/216,247                                                                              
                  drug carrier system that necessitates the inclusion of a surfactant.”  In this                           
                  regard, appellants point out (Brief, bridging paragraph, pages 5-6),                                     
                                Lacy discloses a carrier system for a hydrophobic drug                                     
                         including a digestible oil and a surfactant component.  The                                       
                         surfactant component includes 1) a hydrophilic surfactant                                         
                         component that fails to substantially inhibit the lipolysis of the                                
                         digestible oil, or 2) a hydrophilic surfactant component that                                     
                         substantially inhibits the in vivo lipolysis of the digestible oil and a                          
                         lipophilic surfactant component capable of at least substantially                                 
                         reducing the inhibitory effect of the hydrophilic surfactant….                                    
                  Accordingly, appellants assert (Brief, page 4), Lacy teaches away from the                               
                  claimed invention.  According to appellants (Brief, page 6), contrary to the                             
                  disclosure of Lacy, their claimed composition “specifically excludes a surfactant.”                      
                         Appellants are correct (see e.g., Brief, page 6) in that Lacy discloses in                        
                  the background of the specification (column 1, lines 21-23), “the administration of                      
                  drug in oil alone is not advantageous because of the poor miscibility of the oil                         
                  with the aqueous environment of the gastrointestinal tract.”  Upon review of Lacy,                       
                  we find that Lacy discloses (column 3, lines 39-45), the invention “in its broadest                      
                  aspect provides a carrier system for a hydrophobic drug which comprises: (a) a                           
                  digestible oil, and (b) a pharmaceutically acceptable surfactant for dispersing the                      
                  oil in vivo upon administration of the carrier system, said surfactant comprising a                      
                  hydrophilic surfactant component….”  As we understand Lacy’s disclosure, Lacy                            
                  overcomes the disadvantages of using drug in oil alone by including a hydrophilic                        
                  surfactant to the drug in oil composition.                                                               
                         However, as Lacy points out (column 3, lines 50-52), the majority of                              
                  hydrophilic surfactants “will inhibit the lipolysis of the digestible oil component.”                    
                  Therefore, to overcome the inhibitory effect of the hydrophilic surfactant, Lacy’s                       






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007