Ex Parte Magro - Page 2



          Appeal No. 2004-0940                                                              
          Application No. 09/908,146                                                        

          which is coupled to a requesting device before the requested data                 
          is captured.  To address the potential data corruption problem, a                 
          masking circuit is provided which allows passage of the strobe                    
          signal in response to a reset signal generated by a memory                        
          controller, but subsequently blocks the strobe signals before the                 
          strobe signal enters the tristate phase.                                          
                Claim 1 is illustrative of the invention and reads as                       
          follows:                                                                          
                1.   A data transfer subsystem configured to control passage                
                of data through a data transfer gate in communication with a                
                requesting device in a processor-based system, including:                   
                     data transfer logic configured to generate a data                      
                transfer command in response to a data transfer request by                  
                the requesting device;                                                      
                     data mask logic configured to generate an end of                       
                transfer command upon completion of the data transfer; and                  
                     a masking module coupled to a data strobe input of the                 
                data transfer gate, wherein the masking module is configured                
                to mask a data strobe signal conveyed to the data strobe                    
                input responsive to the data mask logic generating the end                  
                of transfer command.                                                        
                The Examiner relies on the following prior art:                             
          Ooishi et al. (Ooishi)           6,067,260            May 23, 2000                
                Claims 1-22, 24, and 25, all of the appealed claims, stand                  
          finally rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by                 
          Ooishi.                                                                           

                                             2                                              




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007