Appeal No. 2004-0940 Application No. 09/908,146 (CCPA 1967), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 1057 (1968), reh’g denied, 390 U.S. 1000 (1968). Accordingly, since all of the claim limitations are not present in the disclosure of Ooishi, we do not sustain the Examiner’s 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) rejection of appealed independent claims 1, 7, 14, 18, 20, and 22, nor of claims 2-6, 8-13, 15-17, 19, 21, 24, and 25 dependent thereon. Therefore, the decision of the Examiner rejecting claims 1-22, 24, and 25 is reversed. REVERSED JERRY SMITH ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT MICHAEL R. FLEMING ) APPEALS AND Administrative Patent Judge ) INTERFERENCES ) ) ) ) JOSEPH F. RUGGIERO ) Administrative Patent Judge ) JFR/hh 6Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007