Appeal No. 2004-0505
Application No. 09/338,812
Examiner has not established a prima facie case of obviousness with
respect to the claims on appeal. Accordingly, we do not sustain
the Examiner’s 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) rejection of appealed independent
claims 1, 7, and 13, nor of claims 3-6, 9-12, and 15-24 dependent
thereon. Therefore, the Examiner’s decision rejecting claims 1,
3-7, 9-13, and 15-24 is reversed.
REVERSED
ERROL A. KRASS )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
JERRY SMITH ) APPEALS
Administrative Patent Judge ) AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
JOSEPH F. RUGGIERO )
Administrative Patent Judge )
JFR/lp
7
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007