Ex Parte Dobson et al - Page 1




            The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
                   for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.         

                                                                 Paper No. 28         

                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                      
                                     ____________                                     
                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                          
                                   AND INTERFERENCES                                  
                                     ____________                                     
                              Ex parte STEWART B. DOBSON                              
                                and MALEK ABDUL MASSIH                                
                                     ____________                                     
                                 Appeal No. 2004-0526                                 
                              Application No. 09/981,975                              
                                     ____________                                     
                                  HEARD: May 4, 2004                                  
                                     ____________                                     
          Before ABRAMS, STAAB, and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.               
          STAAB, Administrative Patent Judge.                                         

                                  DECISION ON APPEAL                                  
               Steward B. Dobson and Malek Abdul Massih (appellants) appeal           
          from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 1-4 and 7-9, all the          
          claims currently pending in the application.                                
               Appellants’ invention pertains to a tool for driving a headed          
          fastener, and more particularly to a socket type tool or a                  
          nutsetter.  A further understanding of the invention can be derived         
          from a reading of claim 1, the sole independent claim on appeal,            
          which reads as follows (with emphasis added):                               







Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007