Appeal No. 2004-0531 Application 09/871/126 work machine having a chassis and at least one ground engaging member. A basic understanding of the invention can be derived from a reading of exemplary claims 1, 10, and 14, respective copies of which appear in “APPENDIX A” of the brief (Paper No.9). As evidence of obviousness, the examiner has applied the documents listed below: Whiteley 1,743,645 Jan. 14, 1930 Adinoff 3,502,380 Mar. 24, 1970 Hart 4,090,723 May 23, 1978 Hickman et al 6,016,885 Jan. 25, 2000 (Hickman) The following rejections are before us for review. Claims 1 through 7, 10, and 12 through 15 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Hickman in view of Hart and Adinoff. Claims 8, 9, and 11 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Hickman in view of Hart, Adinoff, and Whiteley. 2Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007