Ex Parte Boulton et al - Page 2




         Appeal No. 2004-0531                                                       
         Application 09/871/126                                                     


         work machine having a chassis and at least one ground engaging             
         member.  A basic understanding of the invention can be derived             
         from a reading of exemplary claims 1, 10, and 14, respective               
         copies of which appear in “APPENDIX A” of the brief (Paper No.9).          


              As evidence of obviousness, the examiner has applied the              
         documents listed below:                                                    


         Whiteley                 1,743,645                Jan. 14, 1930            
         Adinoff                  3,502,380                Mar. 24, 1970            
         Hart                     4,090,723                May  23, 1978            
         Hickman et al            6,016,885                Jan. 25, 2000            
         (Hickman)                                                                  


              The following rejections are before us for review.                    


              Claims 1 through 7, 10, and 12 through 15 stand rejected              
         under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Hickman in             
         view of Hart and Adinoff.                                                  


              Claims 8, 9, and 11 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a)           
         as being unpatentable over Hickman in view of Hart, Adinoff, and           
         Whiteley.                                                                  


                                         2                                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007