The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not
written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper 32
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte HONGJIANG SONG
__________
Appeal No. 2004-0593
Application No. 09/606,688
___________
ON BRIEF
___________
Before LEE, MEDLEY, and MOORE, Administrative Patent Judges.
MOORE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the final
rejection of claims 1-4, 7-10, 13-16, 25, 27, 31, 35, and 39.
Claims 5, 6, 11, 12, 17, 18, 28, 29, 32, 33, 36, and 37 are
allowable; while claims 19-24, 26, 30, 34, and 38 are allowable if
rewritten. Accordingly, claims 1-4, 7-10, 13-16, 25, 27, 31, 35,
and 39 are before us on this appeal.
REPRESENTATIVE CLAIMS
The appellant has not expressly grouped the claims in any
groups, although claims 1, 7, 13, and 25 appear to be argued in
one group (Appeal Brief, page 5, lines 21-23), claims 3, 9, and 15
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007