Ex Parte Brown et al - Page 1




          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for
          publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                      

                                                            Paper No. 19              

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                                                                     
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                                                                     
                             Ex parte MICHAEL LEE BROWN,                              
                     NINEV KARL ZIA and SHAILESH SHARAD MANOHAR                       
                                                                                     
                                Appeal No. 2004-0616                                  
                               Application 09/692,982                                 
                                                                                     
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                                                                     
          Before COHEN, ABRAMS, and FRANKFORT, Administrative Patent                  
          Judges.                                                                     
          FRANKFORT, Administrative Patent Judge.                                     

                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   

          This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final                      
          rejection of claims 1, 4 through 6, 8 through 11, 14 through 16             
          and 18 through 20, which are all of the claims remaining in this            
          application.  Claims 2, 3, 7, 12, 13 and 17 have been canceled.             


          Appellants’ invention relates to an improved furnace heat                   
          exchanger of the multipass clamshell type constructed in such a             

                                          1                                           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007