Appeal No. 2004-0616
Application 09/692,982
For the reasons set forth above, we find that the examiner
has not made out a prima facie case of obviousness, and for that
reason we will not sustain the examiner’s rejection of claims 1,
4 through 6, 8 through 11, 14 through 16 and 18 through 20 under
35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Reinke.
Since we have not sustained any of the exami- ner’s
rejections on appeal, it follows that the decision of the
examiner rejecting claims 1, 4 through 6, 8 through 11, 14
through 16 and 18 through 20 of the present application under
35 U.S.C. § 103(a) is reversed.
REVERSED
IRWIN CHARLES COHEN )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
NEAL E. ABRAMS ) APPEALS
Administrative Patent Judge ) AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
CHARLES E. FRANKFORT )
Administrative Patent Judge )
CEF:psb
13
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007