Ex Parte Hower et al - Page 1




            The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
                   for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.         

                                                                 Paper No. 12         

                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                      
                                     ____________                                     
                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                          
                                   AND INTERFERENCES                                  
                                     ____________                                     
                      Ex parte PHILIP L. HOWER and LARRY WOFFORD                      
                                     ____________                                     
                                 Appeal No. 2004-0619                                 
                              Application No. 10/061,140                              
                                     ____________                                     
                                       ON BRIEF                                       
                                     ____________                                     
          Before GARRIS, OWENS, and TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges.               
          GARRIS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                        


                                  DECISION ON APPEAL                                  
               This is a decision on an appeal from the final rejection of            
          claims 1-5, 9-11 and 14-17.  The only other claims remaining in the         
          application, which are claims 7, 8, 13, 19 and 20, stand objected           
          to by the Examiner but otherwise allowable.                                 
               The subject matter on appeal relates to a method of                    
          manufacturing a metal-oxide-semiconductor transistor structure and          
          to the transistor structure itself.  This appealed subject matter           
          is adequately illustrated by independent claim 1 which reads as             
          follows:                                                                    







Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007