Appeal No. 2004-0634 Application No. 09/948,271 40 USPQ2d 1309, 1311 (Fed. Cir. 1996) (citing In re Dillon, 919 F.2d 688, 693, 16 USPQ2d 1897, 1901 (Fed. Cir. 1990)(in banc)). Accordingly, based on the record before us, we find that the examiner has established a prima facie case of obviousness. The decision of the examiner is affirmed. No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a). AFFIRMED Edward C. Kimlin ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT Charles F. Warren ) APPEALS AND Administrative Patent Judge ) INTERFERENCES ) ) ) Thomas A. Waltz ) Administrative Patent Judge ) CFW/JV/cam -5-Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007