The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 76 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte WAYNE R. THOMAS and KAW-YAN CHUA __________ Appeal No. 2004-0735 Application No. 08/081,540 __________ ON BRIEF1 __________ Before WINTERS, ADAMS, and MILLS, Administrative Patent Judges. ADAMS, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 47-49, which are all the claims pending in the application. Claims 47-49 are reproduced below: 47. An isolated nucleic acid encoding a peptide comprising at least one epitope recognized by a T or a B cell receptor specific for a Der p VII protein allergen comprising the amino acid sequence shown in Figure 3 (SEQ ID NO: 2). 48. The isolated nucleic acid of claim 47, wherein the epitope is a T cell epitope. 49. The isolated nucleic acid of claim 47, wherein the epitope is a B cell epitope. The examiner relies on the following reference: 1 Appellants waived their request for oral hearing. Paper No. 75, received March 17, 2004. Accordingly, we considered this appeal on Brief.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007