Appeal No. 2004-0744 Page 10 Application No. 09/671,188 and 26). We conclude that the examiner has not established a prima facie case of obviousness of claims 1 through 6, 8 through 10, 15 through 17, 20, and 22 through 42. Accordingly, the examiner’s decision rejecting those claims under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) is reversed. REVERSED ) Sherman D. Winters ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT Demetra J. Mills ) Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND ) ) ) INTERFERENCES Lora Green ) Administrative Patent Judge )Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007