Ex Parte Ehrlich - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2004-0753                                                        
          Application No. 10/120,096                                                  


          opposite end portions of each said panel being offset from said             
          inner skins at said middle portion of each said panel;                      
               a logistics plate member associated with said inner skins at           
          said offset opposite end portions thereof for spacing at least a            
          portion of said panel end portions apart from each other a                  
          predetermined distance, said logistics plate member having a                
          plurality of apertures therethrough for acceptance of an                    
          associated member; and                                                      
               a splicing member associated with said outer skins at said             
          opposite end portions thereof for joining said outer skins                  
          together.                                                                   
                                 THE PRIOR ART                                        
               The references relied on by the examiner to support the                
          final rejection are:                                                        
          Yurgevich et al.              5,066,066         Nov. 19, 1991               
          (Yurgevich)                                                                 
          Higham                        2 107 258         Apr. 27, 1983               
          British Patent Document                                                     
                                   THE REJECTION                                      
               Claims 37 through 41, 43 through 50 and 52 stand rejected              
          under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Higham in               
          view of Yurgevich.                                                          
               Attention is directed to the main and reply briefs (Paper              
          Nos. 12 and 14) and to the final rejection and answer (Paper Nos.           
          8 and 13) for the respective positions of the appellant and the             
          examiner regarding the merits of this rejection.                            





                                          2                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007