Ex Parte Rafferty - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2004-0827                                                        
          Application No. 09/795,701                                                  


          invention may be seen from representative independent claim 1 which         
          is reproduced below:                                                        
               1.  For use in combination with a utility box having a bottom,         
          a side wall, and a cover which may be opened to gain access to the          
          interior of the box, and which when closed, overlaps an upper edge          
          of the side wall, a lock assembly for maintaining the cover in its          
          closed position, said lock assembly comprising:                             
               a bracket having first and second mutually spaced flanges              
          integrally joined by an intermediate web;                                   
               a jaw mechanically interengaged with and carried by said               
          bracket for movement between said first and second flanges, said            
          bracket being configured for removable mounting on said side wall,          
          with said intermediate web interposed between said cover and the            
          upper edge of said side wall, and with said first flange and                
          said jaw respectively located adjacent exterior and interior                
          surfaces of said side wall;                                                 
               force exerting means for urging said jaw towards said first            
          flange to thereby clamp said side wall therebetween;                        
               a cap having a lip configured and dimensioned to overlap said          
          cover; and interlocking means for securing said cap to said                 
          bracket.                                                                    
               The examiner has relied upon the following references as               
          evidence of obviousness:                                                    
          Nielsen, Jr. (Nielsen)       4,080,811          Mar. 28, 1978               
          Redmayne                     4,202,574          May 13, 1980                
               The claims on appeal stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a)           
          as unpatentable over Nielsen in view of Redmayne (Answer, page 3,           
          referring to Paper No. 11).  We reverse this rejection essentially          



                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007