Ex Parte Kagen - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2004-0890                                                        
          Application No. 09/754,291                                 Page 2           


                    1. A hand-maneuvered snow clearing plow comprising:               
                    a wedge-shape blade having at least one hinge;                    
                    a heating element secured along only a bottom edge of             
               said blade; and                                                        
                    a handle attached to a rear side of said blade.                   
               The prior art references of record relied upon by the                  
          examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are:                              
          Mason, Jr. (Mason)            1,276,672           Aug. 20, 1918             
          Klima et al. (Klima)          1,755,695           Apr. 22, 1930             
          Clements                      2,700,096           Jan. 18, 1955             
          Denker et al. (Denker)        2,763,506           Sep. 18, 1956             
          Carlson                       3,431,661           Mar. 11, 1969             
          Kim                           5,357,646           Oct. 25, 1994             
          Kahley                        5,676,412           Oct. 14, 1997             
          Sinclair, Jr. (Sinclair)      5,706,592           Jan. 13, 1998             
               Claims 1, 7-9, 11, 15-19, 21 and 22 stand rejected under               
          35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Mason in view of              
          Clements and Kim.  Claims 2-5 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.                
          § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Mason in view of Clements,              
          Kim, and Klima.  Claim 6 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a)           
          as being unpatentable over Mason in view of Clements, Kim, and              
          Denker.  Claims 10 and 20 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a)           
          as being unpatentable over Mason in view of Clements, Kim and               
          Sinclair.  Claims 12-14 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a)             
          as being unpatentable over Mason in view of Clements, Kim and               
          Kahley.  Claims 1-9, 11, 15-19, 21 and 22 stand rejected under              










Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007